There are so many highlights of this course that it is difficult to address them all. First and foremost seems to be a reoccurring theme discussed by many students in this class. I was pleasantly surprised to find out that this class does not focus on traditional research, but instead on a new concept to me, action research. Basically, I am now able to put a name to the challenge of identifying problems to be addressed on campus and how to go about finding solutions in an organized manner. I have truly enjoyed it!
Secondly, I now have a newfound respect for revision. When I first set out to complete the template for my action research plan, I felt that I had it all figured out and no changes would need to be made. However, I have now revised my action research plan not once, but twice, and I am certainly open now to the possibility that it still may need revisions in the future.
This brings me to my next highlight of the course. Due to part of our assignments being the need to reply to discussion boards and comment on blogs, I have gained new insights into my action research plan which also led to some of the revisions that I made to it. These suggestions have been invaluable. These comments ranged from how to relay my research information to staff, how to achieve better buy in from my staff, how to go about specific activities within my research plan, as well as even recommendations of types of technology to use in regards to my evaluation process.
Now in regards to specifics that I have learned in this class that I feel are strategies that I will continue to use throughout my career in regards to action research. I especially feel that I have gained new insight into strategies to support and sustain action research. These are the three concepts that we learned about last week: Force Field Analysis, Delphi Method, and Nominal Group Technique. I think all of these three strategies are definitely effective in determining school needs that need to be addressed and improved upon. I feel that I could use all of these strategies to sustain improvement on our campus. The Nominal Group Technique is a great way to first get some ideas together that need to be addressed. The Force Field Analysis can then help to determine if these changes are truly possible or can help to decide which issue might be the best one to tackle first. The Delphi Method would then be a great way to reach the masses and narrow down exactly what areas of the change are the most pressing or important in their opinion.
I have learned so much from the readings that we have been assigned from both texts for this course, but one is certainly my favorite. Dana (2009) provides great insight into what administrator inquiry is and what all it involves. The book then explains the differences between traditional research and action research as well as the benefits of engaging in inquiry. Then areas to look into in regards to finding an inquiry are given as well as wonderful examples in each area. The specifics of the action research plan are discussed and it concludes with the importance and how to share your work with others as well as how to assess the quality of the inquiry. Dana summarizes it well, “Through engagement in principal inquiry, you replenish and invigorate your work as an educator…you become head learner, the most important role any principal could ever play…” (p. 186).
References
Dana, N. (2009). Leading with passion and knowledge: The principal as action
researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.